Free polls from Pollhost.com
Should we set a cap on bankers' salaries to prevent future crisis?
Yes! Get the bastards! No! They deserve every penny!   

Sunday, November 20, 2005

STX Pan Ocean @ 86.5 cts ( Shipping / Korea ) 10 comments



(P.S: Sorry for any disturbances the advertisements above may have caused you)

Main issues

1.Pressure on bulk shipping rates

2.IPO risk

3.Political risk


STX Pan Ocean is the top bulk shipper in South Korea, and one of the world's leading companies in this field as well. In terms of stability it can be considered a shipping blue chip.

That is really not saying much when we consider the cyclicality of the shipping industry. Top shippers like NOL went deep into the red in bad years like 2002, illustrating how badly hit shippers can be by deteriorating global trade and consequently low freight rates. Although global trade is booming now, the good days of surging freight and charter rates for shippers and shipowners in 2003-04 are over: massive numbers of new ships, on order at shipyards since 2003, are coming onstream starting 2006 and shipping rates are starting to soften significantly: just watch the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) collapse from >5500 in late 2004 to ~3000 now.

Any investor worth his salt would be aware of the above macro trend. The issue for them would be whether to take advantage of low share prices for shipping companies to buy in now, due to the fact that many shippers are trading at near their NTA and at very low trailing PE valuations now. NOL, for example, at $2.95 last traded is only slightly above its NTA of $2.80 and at only 3 X trailing PE. Similarly, STX is trading at only about 1.3X NTA and 5-6X trailing PE.

The question is, are these low valuations meaningful? I have long maintained that low PEs are hardly relevant for cyclicals, and this is no exception. NTA is a more effective price support, albeit psychologically: imagine if a stream of new ships are due to come online, will the shippers be able to liquidate their fixed assets (ie. existing ships) at suggested NTA value even if they wanted to?

What becomes more important during an inflationary economic phase, which is what I see the global business cycle trending towards, is whether a business has the pricing power to maintain margins, and/or the economies of scale to trim average operating costs while growing revenues. The former reason is definitely not applicable to shipping: inflation significantly raises prices of key inputs such as bunker fuel and capital (through interest rates), while the easing shipping capacity supply situation (due to new ships coming onstream) means revenue rates per ton transported are likely to drop or at best, stabilise. The latter reason may be a reason for buying into shipping blue chips like NOL and STX; both are big shipping operations with substantial negotiating power. Yet I would rather buy NOL than STX: the former is into container liners which have seen rates plateau rather than collapse, suggesting underlying strength, while the latter's main business is in dry bulk transport which constitutes about 80-90% of total revenue. This kind of one-trick pony situation is unhealthy and STX has been trying to diversify out into other forms of shipping (oil/LNG/container) and recently logistics (bought a freight forwarder) but that is going to take time and money. That Oct 2005 purchase of a mere 20% stake in the freight forwarder cost US$160M; as at end Sep 2005 STX's cash resources were US$184M --> it doesn't have much more expansion capital now. You know what a need for capital often leads to: either more debt (amid a rising interest rate environment), or more placements (dilution of existing shareholders).

As a matter of fact, I often also put a risk discount for new IPOs, because IPO year earnings often turn out to be the best. STX, by virtue of its size, is likely to be more stable and hence that discount may be less. But don't forget the country discount. I have mentioned it in a post in another blog: PE valuations in different countries. Korea's market PE is below 10 times, for several reasons: firstly, political risk, in the form of North Korea; secondly, financial risk, as has been revealed by the chaebol collapse during the 1997 Asian currency crisis (although nowadays the debt situation is better). Why do you think STX, Korea's biggest shipper, chose to list in Singapore? To get a better IPO price, that's why. (Incidentally, STX had to IPO at a low price of $0.90 in July, way below its target of $1.27, due to lack of demand) In the event that tensions flare again in the Korean peninsula, all bets are off for the downside, especially for companies like STX whose businesses are inextricably linked to trade. Somehow, I don't think such country risk is factored into small investors' thinking, yet it is as real as any other commonly-considered business fundamentals.

Buy this stock only if you hanker after the dividend payout, which I expect to be ~S$0.10 or so (based on annualised 1H05 profits and dividend policy of at least 30% earnings payout). Remember, though, that the company is likely to be quite tight-fisted given its simultaneous need for capital to expand. And be ready to hold long-term (perhaps until the next shipping cycle)?

 

 

10 Comments:

Anonymous cash flow industry said...

Hello DanielXX, been looking for the latest info on notenetwork and found STX Pan Ocean @ 86.5 cts (Shipping). Though not exactly what I was searching for, it did get my attention. Interesting post, thanks for a great read.

11/22/2005 10:41 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your posts are deep enough for newbie investors like me to understand. A great eye opener...
Thank you very much.

11/22/2005 12:55 PM  
Anonymous real estate note said...

Hi there DanielXX, I had been out looking for some new information on cash flow note when I found your site and STX Pan Ocean @ 86.5 cts (Shipping). Though not just what I was searching for, it drew my attention. An interesting post and I thank you for it.

11/22/2005 1:10 PM  
Blogger DanielXX said...

Dear anonymous,
It's good you enjoy it. I don't use technical language if I don't have to, and that is most of the time. Investing is about common sense, and one should treat it as such. Cheers.

11/23/2005 7:53 AM  
Anonymous Hedgie said...

Hi, just like to point out a couple of things...

1) You kept comparing the fortunes of STX with that of NOL, even though you clearly pointed out that NOL is into container shipping while STX is in the business of dry bulk transportation. Even though they are both in the shipping business which are affected adversely by higher bunker and port rates, their demand/supply dynamics differ vastly. BDIY has come off its high of >6,000 in late 2004, to a lows of 1,700s in August this year, but it has since rebound to the ~3,000 level and holding well. Container rates, meanwhile, are coming off. Besides, the demand/supply outlook for the dry bulk industry looks benign compared to container shipping. Clarkson projects demand growth for dry bulk will average 3.7% annually until 2009, with supply growth to average only 3.3% annually.

2) And STX is definitely not Korea's biggest shipper. For example, Hanjin Shipping and Hyundai Merchant Marine have a market cap of ~US$1.5b and ~US$1.3b respectively versus STX Pan Ocean's ~US$900m.

Beside the points above, I enjoy your post and will definitely be here again to exchange more views.

11/24/2005 12:06 AM  
Blogger DanielXX said...

Hi hedgie,
You are correct, even though both companies are in the shipping industry STX is primarily a builk shipper while NOL mainly operates container shipping. In general both are affected by rising supply (through new ships); that is a common point. The demand dynamics: container shipping is driven by demand for finished goods ie. consumer demand. Bulk shipping is driven by investment in new infrastructure/capacity building. You are right in pointing out the difference in demand dynamics. But I see consumer demand as being steadier than investment demand, because the latter's margin growth has been driven mainly by one country: China. I also draw attention to the recent profit collapses of HG Metal and Noble (which is probably a better comparison, being in the bulk shipping industry herself).

Might have conveniently typed "Korea's biggest shipper" instead of "Korea's biggest bulk shipper" (;-p) which I believe STX.
is.

My views against your views. There are no absolutes, only improvement through sharing. cheers.

11/24/2005 12:44 AM  
Anonymous Hedgie said...

Hi DanielXX,

I started to read through some of your earlier posts and I must say, I'm impressed!

You dare to go against the tide of a generally bullish local market , and despite being "wrong" on some counters (time would tell though), you kept your head up against those critics who only look at the share price, and not your arguments.

And the time spent on researching must be great! I'm impressed by your dedication despite not being a professional investor.

I've taken the liberty to link to this site from my new blog. I'm still very much in the learning process and generally look at the AsiaPac ex Japan markets.

Once again, thanks for your wonderful insights in your blog.

11/24/2005 5:26 AM  
Blogger DanielXX said...

Hi hedgie I think it's a compliment for my blog to be linked from elsewhere; I've visited your blog and the articles insider are quite interesting . If you have got the interest in the subject you will not find it a big effort to maintain the blog and add new articles; all the best!

11/25/2005 8:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello DanielXX,
it is now April 2006. Do you have any new update on it?

Cheers,
sg

4/17/2006 9:20 PM  
Blogger DanielXX said...

Hi sg,
Not planning to do stock updates for my blog... no novelty hahaha. For STX, with the upcoming supply of ships resulting in margin crimp finally being recognised, and with input (oil) prices at a high level, I cannot see any reason to buy. Steady demand is not an adequate reason to buy a stock.

However, if they can get good returns out of Korea Express, that might be interesting. That might be a good buy although it was the reason for DBS downgrading the stock last year.

4/17/2006 10:08 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home